Research financing on Linkedin.
Bridge the gap between traditional grant funding and crowdfunding.
The Friend-Expert (FE) Framework is a novel approach to research financing that aims to bridge the gap between traditional grant funding and crowdfunding. This framework is based on the idea that individuals who are passionate about a particular research project can contribute small amounts of money to support it, much like they would support a friend in need.
Build a community of supporters
Under the FE Framework, researchers are encouraged to build a community of supporters who are invested in their work and willing to contribute to its financing. This approach is particularly useful for research projects that may not be attractive to traditional grant funders, such as those that are exploratory or high-risk.
The FE Framework has three key components: The Friend, The Expert, and The Network.
The Friend: The Friend refers to the community of supporters that a researcher builds around their work. These supporters may include family, friends, colleagues, and other individuals who are passionate about the research project. The researcher must engage with this community and keep them informed about the progress of the project to maintain their interest and support.
The Expert: The Expert refers to the professional community of researchers and industry experts who are interested in the research project. The researcher must engage with this community to build credibility and gain valuable insights and feedback.
The Network: The Network refers to the broader community of stakeholders who are impacted by the research project. This may include patients, caregivers, policy makers, and other groups who have a vested interest in the research outcomes. The researcher must engage with this community to understand their needs and perspectives and to ensure that the research is relevant and impactful.
To implement the FE Framework, researchers must take a strategic approach to building and engaging with their community of supporters. This may involve creating a compelling narrative around the research project, leveraging social media to reach a broader audience, and hosting events to engage with the community.
In terms of financing, researchers can use a variety of tools and platforms to collect contributions from their community of supporters. This may include traditional crowdfunding platforms, such as Kickstarter or GoFundMe, or specialized platforms that are designed for research financing, such as Experiment.com or Consano.
Advantages with research financing on Linkedin.
One of the advantages of the FE Framework is that it allows researchers to retain ownership and control over their research project. Unlike traditional grant funding, which often comes with restrictions and requirements, researchers who use the FE Framework can maintain autonomy and flexibility in their work.
In conclusion, the Friend-Expert Framework is a promising approach to research financing that emphasizes community engagement and collaboration. By building a community of supporters and engaging with both professional and stakeholder communities, researchers can leverage this framework to fund their projects and advance their work.
Research seeks new knowledge, while development work uses knowledge to develop new or improved products, systems, processes or methods. The difference can be very simply described as one discovers in research, while one invents in development work.
Requirements for scientific knowledge
Scientific knowledge is acquired through systematic and methodical research, which involves collecting and classifying data, making observations and experiments, and analyzing available material. The production of new knowledge and innovation with a reliable and relevant methodology is the essence of scientificity. A degree project must substantiate non-obvious claims by providing thorough reasoning and justifying arguments. Referencing is mandatory for all facts, even if only summarizing what someone wrote. Relating the work to literature and scientific knowledge is essential. Distinguishing between personal and others’ data, as well as between facts and interpretations, is crucial. The report should describe the methodology, results, and discussion separately.